Growing up in North Carolina, much of my early education encompassed NC history. Teachers loved to tell stories about the Wright Brothers, Cape Hatteras, and the Lost Colony, but the more interesting stories looking back on those years were the lessons on NC's change in its participation in the US and world economy. In the times considered the "Old South", NC, like much of the South, based its economy on agriculture (specifically the production of cotton and tobacco). When the South lost the Civil War, these massive plantations that were the backbone of the southern economy were failing because of the lack of manpower due to white men that died in the war as well as the liquidation of free slave labor. The South was in shambles, but it had to rebuild. Today, the backbone of the economy in the "New South" has drastically changed because it has had to change. The Triangle (Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill), is home to excellent intellectual environments including, but not limited to, Duke University, UNC-Chapel Hill, and NC State. In the center of the Triangle, huge contributors to the US and NC economy are based in Research Triangle Park, the largest research park in the US. RTP companies focus on high-tech research and development, and the area makes strides in innovation for the entire technology market. The entire Southern image has not completely changed because of terms like "Old South" and "New South", but in certain aspects of the southern culture in economy, there are drastic differences between old and new.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
From picking cotton to picking people's brains: the transition of Southern economic focus
When Isabella asked us if there really was a difference between the "Old South" and the "New South", I started thinking. There are some aspects of both stereotypical views of the South that have not changed, but there are many that have. Race has been a big part of the transition from old to new, and equal rights are often perceived to be a part of the new, though I doubt this assumption at times. Race rights changes have seemed to be the identifier of any reincarnation of the South in history books, but the hate and inequalities still linger not just in the South, but in much of the United States. The racism is not as blatant as it was in the "Old South", but it still exists. In this way, I think there is not a difference between the "Old South" and the "New South", but let me describe a transition that I mark as an identifier of a change.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Throughout the scope of the class, we've discussed certain aspects of the Old South vs. the New South. When I walked into Dr.Hoefer's ENG1102 class and found out we were going to be studying the South for the entire semester, I wondered how that could ever be possible. Now I realize that one semester is certainly not enough. At the beginning, he emphasized the distinction between the two South's--plantations vs. skyscrapers, slavery vs. freedom. As the class progressed, each person began to develop his/her own opinion of the South. Are the stereotypes accurate, or are they complete fallacies? Most importantly, was there ever a transition from the Old South to the New South?
In my personal opinion, most of the negative Southern stereotypes are a little overrated--yes, people do drive pick-up trucks, and yes there are plantations; but there are Sedans, and buildings, and civilized people. Regarding the transition, I'm not too sure there ever was one... Up until we read Bastard out of Carolina, the transition seemed blatant. Before white trash was looked down upon, violence was prevalent, and discrimination was obvious. However, after reading this book, the so-called "New South" seems to have the same problems, though at a reduced scale. Perhaps the magnitude of the problem is still the same, but the attention and publicity it receives is kept at an optimal "low."
In my personal opinion, most of the negative Southern stereotypes are a little overrated--yes, people do drive pick-up trucks, and yes there are plantations; but there are Sedans, and buildings, and civilized people. Regarding the transition, I'm not too sure there ever was one... Up until we read Bastard out of Carolina, the transition seemed blatant. Before white trash was looked down upon, violence was prevalent, and discrimination was obvious. However, after reading this book, the so-called "New South" seems to have the same problems, though at a reduced scale. Perhaps the magnitude of the problem is still the same, but the attention and publicity it receives is kept at an optimal "low."

I was born in Cali, Colombia--South America. So technically speaking, I am from the South, just not from the American South. When I moved to Florida back in '99, my classmates mentioned how they had seen a truck with a Confederate flag as the drove to school. But it wasn't simply them mentioning something they had seen--their words seem to have some sort of scorn, disrespect maybe, and even mock. They then went on to say that these people were "Southerners," statement which confused me quite a bit. Confederate flag? What in the world is that? If I am from the South, how come I had no idea what that was? Hmm...interesting. As the conversation progressed, one of my classmates asked me if I knew what a 'redneck' was. Surely, my eyes gave away the confusion I was in! Redneck? Huh? Oh goodness, was I in for quite a ride! They explained to me that these are people who live in the South--the American South, they added for clarification. And these people did not like Hispanics. Say what? They don't like Hispanics? So I guess that means they don't like me, but they don't even know me?! That sounded awfully silly... As I got older, I didn't really have much contact with Southern culture, much less with Southerners. A country accent is mocked and ridiculed in South Florida, and country music--God forbid someone ever hears you listening to that. Then I decided to come to Tech... well, dang, Tech is in Georgia... and Georgia, that's as Southern as you can get! I guess what I'm trying to say is that when I came here a couple months there was a certain fear that people weren't going to accept me because of where I was born. Southern hospitality was something I was extremely unfamiliar with, as well as Southern home cooking. Ironically enough, the first friend (and I mean friend, not acquaintance) I made here was born in Birmingham, Alabama-- I would dare say that's pretty Southern. She is one of the sweetest people I know--welcoming, loving, accepting. She didn't stereotype me by my nationality, she actually got to know me! All in all, the ideas I had of the South were all pretty flawed, and I'm ever so glad that's the case!
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
My Personal Experience
Living in the South for the eight months that I have been here has definitely supported my vision of what I thought the South was like. I have been living in Baltimore for the 18 years that I have been living so I have experienced the complete opposite of the everyday lifestyle of a southerner. Back at home, the majority of the people have attitudes and are always rude. When you go to a fast food restaurant in Baltimore, the workers do not have any manners and act as if people are forcing them to work there. However, when I came to Atlanta, it was a complete change. Everyone here has manners and have such pleasant attitudes. I must admit that I have always expected anyone from the South to have the classic southern accent that you hear in the movies. Of course not everyone has the deep southern accent, but the majority of the Georgians that I have met at Georgia Tech have the sweet, country-style, ol' southern accent that I absolutely love. The only thing that the south has proven me wrong about is the amount of open land and cornfields that I expected them to have. Since I have been in Atlanta, I have yet to see any cornfields or huge, open land. The closest thing to the stereotypical "cornfields" I expected the south to have, is the woods that my friends and I cleaned up for community service (see picture).
The area that we cleaned up was a large, open space of wildlife. However, we drove a few miles to get to it because the majority of Atlanta's land is taken by buildings, schools, etc. Overall, the South has definitely impressed me and have met all of my expectations of what it's like to be in the south.
The area that we cleaned up was a large, open space of wildlife. However, we drove a few miles to get to it because the majority of Atlanta's land is taken by buildings, schools, etc. Overall, the South has definitely impressed me and have met all of my expectations of what it's like to be in the south.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Run Forrest Run!

The first thing that comes to my mind when thinking about a movie that portrays what it is like to live in the South is Forrest Gump. Forrest Gump is about a young man from Alabama who tells the story about his life and how he meets a girl named Jenny who is there for him through thick and thin. The movie takes place in Savannah, Georgia and every character in the movie has the typical southern accent that you would expect to hear from someone born and raised in the South. Many of the characters also portray the "poor white trash" stereotype such as the bus driver in the clip posted below. All throughout the movie, the audience will notice that in all of scenes there are old country style houses and cornfields everywhere. Forrest and Jenny spend many of their days playing in the cornfields and climbing trees. The soundtrack of Forrest Gump also represented the South well. Of course, Sweet Home Alabama was chosen as one of the main soundtracks because it represented the country-style music that many southerners typically listen to.
Click on picture to see video.

If video does not work, click here.
The Dukes of Hazzard
One movie that really stands out to me as portraying the South in the typical Redneck stereotype is "The Dukes of Hazzard". The two main characters Bo and Luke help with their uncle's moonshine business while running from cops in their car named "General Lee". After Bo and Luke are evicted from their farm, they participate in the annual Hazzard Road Race Rally to try to get their farm back.
The rough synopsis itself is enough to establish a hillbilly stereotype usually associated with the South. The characters' accents, speech and all-around lifestyles are typical assumptions outsiders make of people from the South, and the movie helps fortify these stereotypes in some peoples' minds. Not all southerners (in fact very few southerners) live or act like this movie on an everyday basis. I personally don't know anyone who drives a souped-up racing car with "Dixie Land" as its horn, but as these stereotypes continue to be portrayed in movies, people will keep believing they could be true.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
But I saw it in a movie...

When talking to people not from the South, you sometimes run across certain ones who always ask about common stereotypes in the South. For example, when traveling out of state I have had many different people, upon hearing where I am from, ask me if I hunted, or if I rode ATVs a lot. Most are shocked when they find out that not only do I not do most of these things, but that I also don’t drive a jacked up truck. After this happening many times I began to think, “What would cause them to believe this is how southerners live?” and came to the conclusion that one of the biggest things that affect how others view people from the south is how we are portrayed in movies. People who haven’t had the opportunity to visit the South often only have the media and movies to show them “what southerners are.”
So for this blog topic, find one movie that you feel would cause people from other parts of the country to view the people of the south as the rednecks most movies make southerners out to be. One that stands out blatantly to me is the movie Sweet Home Alabama. This movie contains so many stereotypes and portrays almost all the men from the South as extreme rednecks and southerners in general as idiots.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)